NZ Vet Assn dog policy logical

THE New Zealand Veterinary Assn does not always agree with the letter of the law when it comes to some local bodies and the way they enforce dog control, but that does not mean it believes there should be no laws. The association has its own policy which is in many ways tougher than some bylaws, but is based upon logic, thought for others, and responsible ownership of this country's dogs. The policy is as follows.

NZVA strongly supports those principles of dog control and dog ownership that contribute to creating an harmonious relationship between people, their animals and the environment.

Explanation:
While the benefits of owning a pet are well researched and documented, there is a proportion of society that chooses not to own a dog. Consideration for the needs of non-dog owners and maintenance or enhancement of the environment (including the preservation of native flora and fauna) need to be recognised.

There is evidence of a growing anti-dog lobby group that seeks to enforce tighter controls and ban dogs (and cats) from selected areas.

NZVA encourages all its members to interact with territorial authorities, Dog Obedience networks, Humane Societies and industry at all levels to contribute their knowledge and expertise to help achieve this policy statement.

NZVA believes that the following principles respect the needs of dog owners and non-dog owners.

* The concept of tiered registration for dogs. This concept recognises actions by dog owners such as having a fenced section, having the dog desexed, taking the dog to obedience classes, not breaching the city/council bylaws and having the dog permanently identified. These responsible owners pay a significantly lowered registration fee in recognition of such actions.

* Permanent identification for all dogs by microchipping, identification discs or tattooing. Microchip identification is a permanent, unique, secure and humane system of identification.

* Anti-fouling bylaws. Aesthetically and in the interests of human and animal health, dog owners should be responsible for removing their dog's faeces from public places. Assistance to owners by provision of dog litter bins should be encouraged.

* Leash laws. The only way to ensure that a dog is under the control of its owner is to have it on a leash.

* Designated free play areas and leads-only areas. These ensure that the needs of dog owners, dogs and non-dog owners are met.

* The use of instant fine systems for breach of council bylaws. This sends a clear message to dog owners about their responsibilities.

* Dangerous dogs should be "labelled" by action, not by breed. Dogs caught stock worrying and/or attacking people should be euthanised or, if appropriate, should be offered proven behavioural modification options.

* Puppy socialisation/education classes are recommended. These are a proven way of effectively socialising young animals. (NZVA Puppy Preschool Resource Kit is available from the NZVA office)

* Education initiatives that facilitate learning about the responsibilities of owning a dog and what a dog needs for its optimum health and welfare should be strongly encouraged. (Veterinarians visiting schools is one way)

* To assist in population control, no dogs should leave pounds or shelters unless they have been desexed. Neuter/spay voucher systems to encourage neutering are strongly advocated.

* Registration of both the owner and the property. This would assist animal control authorities to identify and rectify breaches of the Dog Control Act, 1996 and city/district bylaws.

* That there is consistency in messages on dog control and the responsibilities of pet ownership. This is essential if progress in urban animal management is to be made. Formation of the NZ Companion Animal Council as an umbrella organisation to co-ordinate all matters to do with companion animals will enhance communication between interested parties and will facilitate consistency of information.

* Behavioural modification - NZVA supports the development of co-ordinated approaches to behavioural modification of problem dogs, such as nuisance barkers.